What was one of the main criticisms of Wilson's use of military force in Moral Diplomacy?

One of the main criticisms of Wilson's use of military force in Moral Diplomacy centers around the idea that it contradicted his stated goals of promoting democracy. President Woodrow Wilson's approach, known as Moral Diplomacy, was grounded in the belief that the U.S. had a moral responsibility to spread democracy and promote peace. However, his actions often involved military intervention in Latin America and other regions, which led to the overthrow of governments he deemed unfriendly to U.S. interests.

This contradiction became particularly apparent when the use of military force did not align with the democratic ideals Wilson espoused; instead, it appeared to prioritize U.S. control and influence over the genuine establishment of democratic governance in those nations. Critics argued that by resorting to military interventions, Wilson undermined the legitimacy of his diplomatic philosophy and contradicted the notion of respecting the sovereignty and self-determination of other nations. This created skepticism regarding the authenticity of his moral stance, leading to significant backlash against his policies.